LexisNexis(TM) Academic - Document LexisNexis™ Academic Copyright 1999 Newsweek Newsweek December 13, 1999, U.S. Edition SECTION: NATIONAL AFFAIRS; Pg. 30 LENGTH: 1769 words HEADLINE: The Siege of Seattle BYLINE: By Kenneth Klee; With Patricia King and Katrina Woznicki HIGHLIGHT: In a ruckus over foreign trade, a surge of violence rocks the placid '90s. What does this odd coalition of globo-protesters really want? BODY: The nose-ringed young woman in the thick knit poncho looked admiringly at the twisted letters on the marquee of the Nike store. Man, she said, they f----d that up good! Nearby, two young men stood chest to chest, screaming in each other's faces, both tear-stained from the pepper gas wafting along Sixth Avenue in downtown Seattle. One wanted to smash the Nike window, the other to stop him. How do you think they stopped Vietnam? demanded the one with the rock.It was the opening day of the World Trade Organization meeting in Seattle, and all hell was breaking loose. The rest of the week would mark a descent into a deeply weird maelstrom where masked young men rampaged while mixed-up (and sometimes out-of-control) cops shot rubber pellets at the wrong people, including Olivier de Marcellus, a 56-year-old protester from Geneva, who says he took one in his glasses as he stood chanting with the crowd. Helicopters roared overhead and concussion grenades boomed and flashed in front of ritzy downtown properties. Fancy retailers boarded up their windows at the start of the Christmas shopping season. An armored car stood guard at the Four Seasons Hotel. When WTO delegate Henk Campher smelled the tear gas, he says his thought was Home sweet home--in South Africa, where he used to demonstrate against apartheid. Until last week, not so many Americans had even heard of the WTO. Fewer still could have identified it as the small, Geneva-based bureaucracy that the United States and 134 other nations set up five years ago to referee global commerce. To Bill Clinton, it is a mechanism that can allow America to do well and good at the same time. But to many of the 40,000 activists and union members who streamed into Seattle--a clean, scenic city that has grown rich on foreign trade--the WTO is something else again: a secretive tool of ruthless multinational corporations. They charge it with helping sneaker companies to exploit Asian workers, timber companies to clear-cut rain forests, shrimpers to kill sea turtles and a world of other offenses. The protests drew an equally wide array of groups, from stilt walkers to beefy Teamsters mechanics to a guy in a get-up that made him look like J. P. Morgan with a sinister mosquito beak. Where was he from? Planet Earth. Seattle didn't feel like Earth last week--or at least not like the Earth we've come to know in the peaceful and prosperous 1990s. Still, the battle of Seattle, though sparked by a fringe element, cast light on the tensions over who's getting left out of the new global economy, and the images from the streets seemed to form a new face of protest in American life. The reality is that global trade is going to march on in any event; human ambition and the Internet are seeing to that. But it's also true that the process raises some tough questions, and any organization that tries to sort them out is bound to get a lot of people mad. It's a long way from the civil-rights marches in Selma, Ala., to smashing up a Starbucks, but the story of the siege in the Pacific Northwest suggests that liberal activism, all these years later, is not yet dead. There were countless marches, big and small. You could turn a corner and find 1,500 women parading silently with their mouths taped, then stopping and staring at a row of helmeted, booted riot cops. Or watch as a young man with a red beard gathered a spontaneous following by pointing to his friend, who beat loudly on a big plastic bucket. Follow the drum, people! he said. They did. To a lot of people in upwardly mobile Seattle, the meeting had seemed like a great way to showcase their city. And a sophisticated export powerhouse that is home to Microsoft and Boeing--Bill Gates and Phil Condit cochaired the host committee--certainly seemed up to the task. But the better planning was done by the demonstrators--the many nonviolent ones, and even the radical few. Mayor Paul Schell and Police Chief Norm Stamper had plenty of warning that the protests could be violent, but failed to give their undermanned police force enough backup until it was way too late. What were they thinking? Seattle is a gentle place where we agree to disagree, Schell explained last week. Meanwhile, Mike Dolan, field organizer for the Nader group Public Citizen, spent nine months in the city getting things ready (and consulting regularly with city leaders). The Naderites and other groups posted Web pages to educate their followers on the evils of foreign trade and to draw them to Seattle. The demonstrators started showing their tactical smarts the first day of the conference. Early that morning, thousands of activists--who had announced their intention to completely, but peacefully, block access to the huge Washington State Convention Center--had taken up key positions, amounting to a ring around the meeting facilities. The police formed an inner ring, looking formidable in their RoboCop-like riot pads and helmets. The mostly seated protesters couldn't approach the convention hall, but neither could delegates, unless they wanted to risk a scuffle. The start of the meeting had to be delayed. By late morning the cops began trying to clear some streets--not by arresting the kids, which most had expected, but by spraying them with pepper gas and firing rubber pellets at them. They ran, but not far. David McGraw from south Seattle said he got shot twice with the stinging, marble-size pellets. Enter the anarchists. A few dozen evidently came from a Eugene, Ore.-based group that had staged a similar, violent protest in their home downtown earlier this year. Their philosophical leader, 56-year-old anarchist author John Zerzan, was also in town. Whoever they were, in fatigues and black masks, they opened their knapsacks and got out their hammers, spray paint and M-80 firecrackers. With the police still occupied closer to the convention hall, they began their assault on the brand-name retailers: FAO Schwarz, Starbucks, Old Navy and others. They broke windows and painted their A-in-a-circle logo on walls. A short monorail ride away, 20,000 unionists were rallying in the stadium beneath the Space Needle. Big Labor would shortly commence the most massive march of the week, reinforced by some kids dressed as monarch butterflies (threatened, they say, by genetically engineered corn) and some local Laotian refugees protesting the presence of their homeland's communist leaders downtown. The idea was to go all the way to the convention center, but the scene around it had grown even more chaotic, so the marchers turned around. In front of Nike and FAO Schwarz, many protesters were chanting No violence! But the angry street kids who hang out in the same neighborhood where much of the protest was organized--around Seattle Central Community College--had by now come charging down Capitol Hill, and they seemed determined to outdo the anarchists. They hit and ran into the evening, when additional police enforced a curfew by chasing all the kids back up the hill. The area around the college became the scene of one of the day's worst confrontations, with the cops using their constellation of force--including concussion grenades--to disperse turf-conscious crowds, just a few hours before President Clinton's arrival at the trade talks. The Secret Service wasn't about to bring Clinton into a melee. Mayor Schell finally called in the National Guard and established a protest-free zone encompassing the convention center and major hotels. The nights were strangest. That was when you noticed the copters the most, because they had their searchlights on. A curfew kept the downtown streets mostly empty, except for all the National Guardsmen in camouflage suits, carrying riot staves. So what did the trade conference itself achieve to make up for the trashing of downtown Seattle? Very little. The goal was modest to begin with: deciding what would be on the table for the next few years of trade talks. The United States and other agricultural exporters wanted Europe and Japan to cut farm subsidies and let more of their products in. Japan and Brazil wanted the United States to ditch its anti-dumping laws and accept more of their steel. The United States and Europe wanted poor countries to vigorously enforce intellectual-property rights on things like software, movies and biotech. But nobody came ready for compromise. Clinton himself became the focus for much of the discontent. He had come hoping to sell the Trade ministers on ways of putting a human face on the global economy. In particular, he urged the WTO to try to raise labor standards in the developing world and open the WTO's own proceedings to greater public scrutiny. The poor countries didn't mind his call for more openness; they might even benefit from it, since they often think the rich countries exclude them from key decisions. The organization had already taken the first steps in that direction--for example, by accrediting more than 740 groups for last week's meeting. But the poor countries were deeply suspicious of Clinton's tilt toward labor not long after the AFL-CIO endorsed Al Gore's presidential bid. To them, having the WTO decide if they're up to snuff on issues like child labor and the right to organize is just a form of protectionism, sure to be abused by rich-country interest groups. We don't want to be excluded because our eyes aren't blue, says Iqbal Ebrahim, a textile manufacturer and Pakistani delegate. While some Pakistani bosses don't treat workers according to the standards the AFL-CIO advocates, he says, he certainly does. He has to: his 7,000 unionized employees are making products for image-conscious corporations such as Warner Brothers. The trade meetings finally fizzled out on Friday night. U.S. Trade Representative Charlene Barshefsky wearily explained that the negotiators will take a timeout and try again in Geneva. The demonstrators danced in the streets, and of all the graffiti on the walls of the retail district, one seemed especially apt: we win. Still, those who imagine they've halted globalization--or eliminated the need for a traffic cop as it proceeds--are dreaming. National Economic Council chairman Gene Sperling reflected after last week's breakdown that when you take on the largest economic challenges of the day, you're going to hit a few bumps along the way. Seattle could count more than a few of those bumps: $3 million in property damage, at least $10 million in lost Christmas shopping revenues. But, hey, they can afford it. Greater Seattle exported $34 billion worth of goods last year. GRAPHIC: GRAPHIC: (Map) The Downtown Battle Zone (Graphic omitted); PHOTO: 'WE WIN': Rampaging protesters attacked any symbol of globalization--like this Starbucks shop ; PHOTO: CLOUDY DAYS: A spasm of violent rage in 'a gentle place where we agree to disagree'; PHOTO: AT THE FRONT: The police used tear gas and rubber pellets against some demonstrators LOAD-DATE: December 7, 1999